Manette Tanelus: CRANK

By -
While reading Crank, I consistently found myself thinking of the psychological debate of nature versus nurture because I think Kristina and Bree are a classic example of that. On one hand, Kristina's lack of self esteem and loneliness stems from the abandonment of her father that she never dealt with and being cast aside by her mother. She states this is two important parts of the story when she she says "I've been alone since mom met Scott. He sucked the nectar from her heart like a famished butterfly"(13). I think this also a revealing part of the story in regards to her step father because although his always there for her and seems to take good care of the family she resents him for doing a better job than daddy, and for taking mommy away. He father on the other hand also was not there for her and proved to be inadequate which I think plays a part in leading to her trying Meth. Her staying on meth from nurture point of view is simply shown by her mother's lack of punishment and inability to see her cry for help.

Nature would provoke us to think that Kristina had an innate need for drugs and curiosity to explore drugs and sex and Alberque gave her that chance. But, Rather it's not that black and white. Kristina's choice to experiment and live out her curiosity is something that occurs to many teenagers her age and is in fact her choice.  she states 'I wanted to meet the monster. Why go down if you can go up"(85)? One cannot blame Kristina's parents entirely for her issues because they did taker care of her child, and they did attempt to get her help but she had become addicted and it was a powerful drug that hooked her. The addiction was not just about the drug. She made the choices she made because the drugs made her feel confident, noticed, happy, awake, alive, and best of all they helped her let go and "fly" as she describes.

Wouldn't it be nice to imagine a world where Kristina was confident enough in herself and not lonely? Would it have made a difference if her mother payed attention? If her father visited? If she stopped letting the attention of boys define her? Would she have still wanted to fly with the monster?
Nature and Nurture sometimes collide in the best of ways and sometimes in the worst ways.

Comments

  1. Lucy McElroyNovember 11, 2016 at 2:43 PM

    I love your post, Manette. I didn't think as deeply into the situation with her stepfather as you did. It's nice to see that you raised that point, that when her mother and stepfather got together, Kristina was almost forgotten. I also like that you recognized that Kristina was crying for help and that she could've been saved. I think a lot of people had a hard time realizing that Kristina was a child in the novel and not capable of making rational decisions. The questions you posed at the end really wrap the whole post up. Awesome job!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Pains - The Symbolism of the Tree in Speak

By -
I have felt the paralyzing pain of internal disease. The kind of trauma that causes your mouth to curl in and swallow you whole. I, like so many other women, are walking the halls in Melinda’s shoes in “Speak.” I thought Laurie Anderson did a phenomenal job of twisting all of the tribulations a high school girl goes through, into the tree that Melinda is. Whether we’re as strong as an oak or weak as a bush, we have all gone through the disease that strikes Melinda from the inside out. Melinda is like a half-dead tree. Some parts of her strive to blossom and create beauty. Other parts are broken and diseased. Like a dead tree, Melinda needs to save herself and “cut off the damage, [so it] is possible for the tree to grow again” (187). The symbolism of a tree is significant in “Speak.” Trees reflect her growing process. In the beginning, Melinda is a sick and lifeless tree. Her view is negative and dark. She’s so far past repair, bursts of sunlight do her no good. Sunlight would be pe...
Read more

How Starr Goes from Acting to Embracing in The Hate U Give

By -
In The Hate U Give, Starr Carter is caught between two worlds. She lives in a predominantly black neighborhood, but her father sends her and her brothers to a private school where she is surrounded by white people. She talks about acting differently depending on what group she is around, which can create some identity problems. She says on page 11, "Funny how it works with white kids though. It's dope to be black until it's hard to be black." When at Williamson, she sees white kids that think it's cool to engage in black culture, but she knows they don't understand what she goes through in her Garden Heights community. She witnessed her friend Natasha's death when she was 10 years old, and she sees gang activity in her community all the time. When she is among her black friends, like at the party, they tease her for hanging out with the white kids. This reminds me of a Drake song where he says, "I used to get teased for being black, and now I'm...
Read more

Postmodernism in Curious Incident

By -
Before I start writing, I first want to acknowledge that I just really loved this book! It seemed like a lot of the class had trouble enjoying or appreciating the novel because it's so different stylistically, which is understandable, but all of those unique elements helped make the novel more authentic. The main topic I want to focus on (also what I'm writing my paper on) is how a lot of postmodernist elements were used in the novel to make Christopher come to life. While obviously not every postmodern novel is about an autistic kid, I think Haddon really used a lot of these elements to his advantage and they ended up working out really well to characterize Christopher. One of the major postmodern elements which helps this book really craft an authentic portrayal of autism is the fact that it's metafictive. Basically, this means it's a "story within a story." Readers would be extremely limited just reading the parts of the novel which are meant to be C...
Read more