13 Reasons Why- Comparison

By -
Both the book and the Netflix adaptation of 13 Reasons Why, written by Jay Asher, show a heartbreaking story of a girl, Hannah Baker, who committed suicide. Although the book came out first, I watched the Netflix show first. I feel as this hurt the way that I read the book. I often hate watching the movie before I read the book because it tells you how you should physically see the characters, rather then allowing yourself to make up what you think they look like. This time it was different. I did not mind already seeing who the characters were while reading this book.
One of the most different things that I noticed from the two adaptations, was the point of view. In the book, it is primarily an intimate conversation between Clay and Hannah, while in the show, we see many different view points (not to the extent of Clay's view point). The show allows us to see how the before and after affects on the characters after they listen to the tapes.
I feel like one of the major differences in the book and the show, is that the show allowed people who do not like to read become aware of the hard topic that is discussed in this book. It allows all types of people to feel, see, and understand what is going on in some schools. I did not even hear about the book before the show and I think that the show allowed others, like me, to gain knowledge of this topic.

Comments

  1. UnknownDecember 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM

    Though I don't have the same experience in the order you were introduced to 13 Reasons Why, but I can see where it altered your perception. I agree that the show allows us to have the multiple perspectives of how the tapes effected each person. The show is a great, great adaptation (despite it having its differences). It does introduce these topics to people who are not avid readers. It is great that it helped you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Pains - The Symbolism of the Tree in Speak

By -
I have felt the paralyzing pain of internal disease. The kind of trauma that causes your mouth to curl in and swallow you whole. I, like so many other women, are walking the halls in Melinda’s shoes in “Speak.” I thought Laurie Anderson did a phenomenal job of twisting all of the tribulations a high school girl goes through, into the tree that Melinda is. Whether we’re as strong as an oak or weak as a bush, we have all gone through the disease that strikes Melinda from the inside out. Melinda is like a half-dead tree. Some parts of her strive to blossom and create beauty. Other parts are broken and diseased. Like a dead tree, Melinda needs to save herself and “cut off the damage, [so it] is possible for the tree to grow again” (187). The symbolism of a tree is significant in “Speak.” Trees reflect her growing process. In the beginning, Melinda is a sick and lifeless tree. Her view is negative and dark. She’s so far past repair, bursts of sunlight do her no good. Sunlight would be pe...
Read more

How Starr Goes from Acting to Embracing in The Hate U Give

By -
In The Hate U Give, Starr Carter is caught between two worlds. She lives in a predominantly black neighborhood, but her father sends her and her brothers to a private school where she is surrounded by white people. She talks about acting differently depending on what group she is around, which can create some identity problems. She says on page 11, "Funny how it works with white kids though. It's dope to be black until it's hard to be black." When at Williamson, she sees white kids that think it's cool to engage in black culture, but she knows they don't understand what she goes through in her Garden Heights community. She witnessed her friend Natasha's death when she was 10 years old, and she sees gang activity in her community all the time. When she is among her black friends, like at the party, they tease her for hanging out with the white kids. This reminds me of a Drake song where he says, "I used to get teased for being black, and now I'm...
Read more

Postmodernism in Curious Incident

By -
Before I start writing, I first want to acknowledge that I just really loved this book! It seemed like a lot of the class had trouble enjoying or appreciating the novel because it's so different stylistically, which is understandable, but all of those unique elements helped make the novel more authentic. The main topic I want to focus on (also what I'm writing my paper on) is how a lot of postmodernist elements were used in the novel to make Christopher come to life. While obviously not every postmodern novel is about an autistic kid, I think Haddon really used a lot of these elements to his advantage and they ended up working out really well to characterize Christopher. One of the major postmodern elements which helps this book really craft an authentic portrayal of autism is the fact that it's metafictive. Basically, this means it's a "story within a story." Readers would be extremely limited just reading the parts of the novel which are meant to be C...
Read more