Manette Tanelus - The world Made Straight

By -
The world made straight was my least favorite book that we have so far, and I believe that is due to the style of writing as well as my inability to relate to the text or become completely involved in the lives of the characters. For example, “The only places with enough water to hold fish were the pools, some no bigger than a washtub. Travis flicked the spinner into each pool and reeled soon as it hit the surface, the spinner moving through the water like a slow bright bullet” (7). Rash spends a lot of his book providing extensive details such as this. He does the same thing as they are driving to Shelton Laurel, and I always find myself feeling like he gave more details than I wanted. 
However, I do enjoy his strategic character developments. I loved how well he created a troubled young man like Travis, who is somewhat ignorant even though he doesn’t seem to think so, and that he makes Travis such a product of his environment. I enjoy the fact that Leonard is an intelligent and capable man but he is essential in the drug business to sustain his girlfriend’s habits, someone who seems to be way of his league. The amount of violence in the story was also very intriguing to me. From the first moment when Travis gets his leg cut, till the very end where they take on Tommy and his son, my attention was caught. However, my attention did waiver in and out. I do enjoy some southern literature such A Rose for Emily, and Barn Burning.  I think the problem with this one for me was the fact that it included nature so much, and made the landscape its own character, which was more realistic and less twisted than Panem from Hunger Games. I am not a very nature friendly person, and felt detached. 
One of my favorite quotes from this book is “There was no need to check to Toomeys’ wrists for pulses, but Travis stepped into the shallows where Carlton Toomey had a fistful of money like a shriveled bouquet” (288). I enjoyed this quote because I feel like it distinctively speaks to Travis’ character and his pride, that even after everything he still took the money and went on his way, claiming it was an “accident” 

Comments

  1. AnonymousOctober 6, 2016 at 8:47 PM

    I understand how you feel that nature is almost over explained and you are not interested in it. But I feel you may be so jaded toward nature that you have missed the point in it's existence in the novel. I happened to love the extensive explanations and imagery that comes with Rash's writing, but the style was, in fact, very hard to follow. I did find it not holding my attention throughout some of the novel. I felt like I could skim some portions and not be missing any vital information. His Character Developments, however, were incredible as you said. He did a very good job in creating distinctly different personas and getting them to correlate in the most interesting ways. I love that last quote you provided us. It's like Carlton's grave was deserved and described him, shallow and marked by a shriveled dignity. He wasn't even deserving of his "shriveled bouquet" as Travis took that away from him in death. Excellent point of view!

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownOctober 7, 2016 at 7:51 AM

    I have to agree that this was undoubtedly my least favorite book thus far. I also agree with your observation that Rash made the land its own character, although the descriptions did tend to get pretty dense. By the way, A Rose for Emily is one of my personal favorites, and I can definitely see some cultural connections between Faulkner and Rash's writings.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownOctober 7, 2016 at 12:31 PM

    Manette, I feel as though Rash provided several minor details as well, but when watching the movie after reading the book, the details of the book are very much appreciated. I also admired the way that we are allowed to see Travis grow a little as a person. He starts off kind of like this troubled young boy who doesn't listen well, then as he spends more time with Leonard, it's as though he humbles himself as a person.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lucy McElroyOctober 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM

    Manette, I can definitely relate to you on becoming bored with Rash's fishing details. I found myself skipping through those sections when he started going on for pages and pages talking about different kinds of fish. I think he did that just to show how ingrained that lifestyle was in Travis's personality. I wish I knew more about fishing, though, because I bet that there are a lot of metaphors woven in those details.

    ReplyDelete
  5. UnknownOctober 7, 2016 at 8:36 PM

    I also like the character developments. Travis is relatable because, of his rebellion and nonchalant attitude in the beginning. I understand how u felt towards the violence because, that'the most interesting occurrence because it rises tension and emotion in the characters and the audience.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Pains - The Symbolism of the Tree in Speak

By -
I have felt the paralyzing pain of internal disease. The kind of trauma that causes your mouth to curl in and swallow you whole. I, like so many other women, are walking the halls in Melinda’s shoes in “Speak.” I thought Laurie Anderson did a phenomenal job of twisting all of the tribulations a high school girl goes through, into the tree that Melinda is. Whether we’re as strong as an oak or weak as a bush, we have all gone through the disease that strikes Melinda from the inside out. Melinda is like a half-dead tree. Some parts of her strive to blossom and create beauty. Other parts are broken and diseased. Like a dead tree, Melinda needs to save herself and “cut off the damage, [so it] is possible for the tree to grow again” (187). The symbolism of a tree is significant in “Speak.” Trees reflect her growing process. In the beginning, Melinda is a sick and lifeless tree. Her view is negative and dark. She’s so far past repair, bursts of sunlight do her no good. Sunlight would be pe...
Read more

How Starr Goes from Acting to Embracing in The Hate U Give

By -
In The Hate U Give, Starr Carter is caught between two worlds. She lives in a predominantly black neighborhood, but her father sends her and her brothers to a private school where she is surrounded by white people. She talks about acting differently depending on what group she is around, which can create some identity problems. She says on page 11, "Funny how it works with white kids though. It's dope to be black until it's hard to be black." When at Williamson, she sees white kids that think it's cool to engage in black culture, but she knows they don't understand what she goes through in her Garden Heights community. She witnessed her friend Natasha's death when she was 10 years old, and she sees gang activity in her community all the time. When she is among her black friends, like at the party, they tease her for hanging out with the white kids. This reminds me of a Drake song where he says, "I used to get teased for being black, and now I'm...
Read more

Postmodernism in Curious Incident

By -
Before I start writing, I first want to acknowledge that I just really loved this book! It seemed like a lot of the class had trouble enjoying or appreciating the novel because it's so different stylistically, which is understandable, but all of those unique elements helped make the novel more authentic. The main topic I want to focus on (also what I'm writing my paper on) is how a lot of postmodernist elements were used in the novel to make Christopher come to life. While obviously not every postmodern novel is about an autistic kid, I think Haddon really used a lot of these elements to his advantage and they ended up working out really well to characterize Christopher. One of the major postmodern elements which helps this book really craft an authentic portrayal of autism is the fact that it's metafictive. Basically, this means it's a "story within a story." Readers would be extremely limited just reading the parts of the novel which are meant to be C...
Read more