Where is the Love? -- The Giver

By Taylor Simmons -
Lois Lowry did a tremendous job with this book, The Giver and I really enjoyed the message it portrays about life and well, living life. Compared to the society that we live in, and Jonas’ community, their differences are tremendous. In The Giver, they have no differences, no emotion, no color, no recollection of any memories or history and so much more. Their lives are so controlled that in a sense they really have no freedom. They have to use a “precision of language” and they have no individual identities. Seeing how different life is in the novel makes me appreciate the world I live in. I appreciate being able to have experienced life and having memories and feeling emotion, even pain. The memories I have from my 21 years of life have taught me so much and makes me appreciate that I do not live in a “community” like Jonas and his “family”.

When I think about my own family, I think about what they mean to me and the emotions I feel. In The Giver, they have “family units” consisting of “two children – one male, one female – to each family unit” (11) and the adults are “given spouses” (9). I could not imagine my parents having to apply to be with one another and then again apply to have my brother and I as their children. To me, the idea of family units in the novel is just not genuine at all. It’s like they are applying to purchase a car or a house when applying for a spouse or children. The couples do not have the ability to meet one another and date and then fall in love, like how it normally happens in our society, and it’s like they apply for a spouse only to have children that are not biologically theirs. Not to say there is anything with children not biologically being your own, but to me in the novel, the family unit is not a concept I would feel comfortable agreeing too.

In my family, we are all about loving one another no matter what and sticking together through trials and tribulations. In The Giver, they cannot feel emotion to know that they love one another. I believe that if the characters in the novel had the ability to feel emotions, they could be a possibility that they would be able to love one another over time just from living and growing with one another. When Gabriel comes home with the family, I noticed the connection Jonas and the baby have. It is quite obvious that Jonas feels emotions with Gabriel, and there is a deeper connection between the two of them.


I really enjoyed this novel, it definitely opened my eyes to new concepts about life and love and being appreciate of the fact that I have the memories I have, good or bad. I can’t imagine a life without memories and it makes me want to sit and think about how my life may have been if there were things I never experienced such as color, emotions, the past and maybe even the future. 

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 10, 2017 at 8:43 AM

    You bring up some good points about how the family functions in this society. I really think the concept of the "family unit" is one of the motifs in the novel that really illuminates the limitations of this society. It's weird to imagine spouses being chosen for you, and applying for your children. The families are brainwashed into thinking that what makes a family is living in the same house and talking about your dreams and feelings every day. In reality, these weird rituals are meant to control everyone's individuality and personality. The beauty of a true family unit are the variances among families: interracial couples, gay and lesbian couples, adopted children, blended families with step siblings and half siblings, different family traditions, variances in number of children, age gaps between them, etc. etc. Families and personal relationships aren't supposed to be regulated and uniformed and clinical.

    ReplyDelete
  2. KeyCOctober 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM

    Yes, I must agree that this book also made me see life differently. It definitely had me thinking deeply about how things are now, and how life would function if we didn't have options for some our ways. Love was also the topic that stuck with me in this novel because I couldn't imagine life without it, and it just made me think of how terribly things would be if we couldn't experience that emotion.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Pains - The Symbolism of the Tree in Speak

By -
I have felt the paralyzing pain of internal disease. The kind of trauma that causes your mouth to curl in and swallow you whole. I, like so many other women, are walking the halls in Melinda’s shoes in “Speak.” I thought Laurie Anderson did a phenomenal job of twisting all of the tribulations a high school girl goes through, into the tree that Melinda is. Whether we’re as strong as an oak or weak as a bush, we have all gone through the disease that strikes Melinda from the inside out. Melinda is like a half-dead tree. Some parts of her strive to blossom and create beauty. Other parts are broken and diseased. Like a dead tree, Melinda needs to save herself and “cut off the damage, [so it] is possible for the tree to grow again” (187). The symbolism of a tree is significant in “Speak.” Trees reflect her growing process. In the beginning, Melinda is a sick and lifeless tree. Her view is negative and dark. She’s so far past repair, bursts of sunlight do her no good. Sunlight would be pe...
Read more

Postmodernism in Curious Incident

By -
Before I start writing, I first want to acknowledge that I just really loved this book! It seemed like a lot of the class had trouble enjoying or appreciating the novel because it's so different stylistically, which is understandable, but all of those unique elements helped make the novel more authentic. The main topic I want to focus on (also what I'm writing my paper on) is how a lot of postmodernist elements were used in the novel to make Christopher come to life. While obviously not every postmodern novel is about an autistic kid, I think Haddon really used a lot of these elements to his advantage and they ended up working out really well to characterize Christopher. One of the major postmodern elements which helps this book really craft an authentic portrayal of autism is the fact that it's metafictive. Basically, this means it's a "story within a story." Readers would be extremely limited just reading the parts of the novel which are meant to be C...
Read more

How Starr Goes from Acting to Embracing in The Hate U Give

By -
In The Hate U Give, Starr Carter is caught between two worlds. She lives in a predominantly black neighborhood, but her father sends her and her brothers to a private school where she is surrounded by white people. She talks about acting differently depending on what group she is around, which can create some identity problems. She says on page 11, "Funny how it works with white kids though. It's dope to be black until it's hard to be black." When at Williamson, she sees white kids that think it's cool to engage in black culture, but she knows they don't understand what she goes through in her Garden Heights community. She witnessed her friend Natasha's death when she was 10 years old, and she sees gang activity in her community all the time. When she is among her black friends, like at the party, they tease her for hanging out with the white kids. This reminds me of a Drake song where he says, "I used to get teased for being black, and now I'm...
Read more