Turn off or on?

By -
Throughout reading Feed I kept having two incredibly juxtaposed ideas and value appear in my head. There is constant conversation in our time about “how much screen time is too much?” Or “when is too early to give children technology. The themes presented in this book show a grim future for the world that values technology so highly. I understood and agreed with that idea. However, another nagging voice in my head had another opinion.
With the world having constant evolution in industry, technology, and economy we are constantly in need of new innovations. Learning has also began slowly evolving in the world with the evolution of technology. We are now seeing computers, iPads, even 3-D printers become available in schools to aid education because stem and technology jobs are in incredibly high demand in this new society.
So when it comes to this conversation, should we shield our children from technology? It could help them mature socially more effectively. However, it could have an adverse effect of stunting your child’s technological intelligence. The difference between not having a computer as a 13 year old or not could be the difference for that student reaching his full potential in engineering and working at a job that doesn’t fit what he wants to do. So I leave you with two questions. Should we put a direct and finite limit on screen time? Should we shield our children from technology until a certain age? I don’t really feel more strongly either way. It is just an interesting discussion.


Comments

  1. Logan FowlerNovember 1, 2019 at 7:03 AM

    I think you have a lot of good thoughts relating to the book. I think that it is good for children to understand technology and have "screen time" but also to have outside time and be educated with the world around them, using technology to understand the world beyond them. I had an interesting thought while reading your post... even class discussions have moved to online portals such as this. It's just an example of how hybrid classes are becoming increasingly valued but at what cost?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kiara McVayNovember 2, 2019 at 1:57 PM

    I do believe that children should be shielded from technology at a certain age because they should learn that there are more important things in the world. Also, yes we should put a limit on screen time to reduce the habit of being attached to technology.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Eva YoussefNovember 3, 2019 at 10:42 PM

    I think the two questions you pose are so interesting and things I think about a lot. I like that you mentioned how maybe leaving a kid at 13 y.o without a computer might put them at a disadvantage educationally and in the working world. I like to think that we can raise children with a healthy balance of both off screen time and time where they can enjoy their technology but also without forgetting about the world around them: nature, their friends, and other social relationships they should be building face to face. If we completely limit them from technology than we are not setting them up for a success in a world that is ever evolving technologically.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Growing Pains - The Symbolism of the Tree in Speak

By -
I have felt the paralyzing pain of internal disease. The kind of trauma that causes your mouth to curl in and swallow you whole. I, like so many other women, are walking the halls in Melinda’s shoes in “Speak.” I thought Laurie Anderson did a phenomenal job of twisting all of the tribulations a high school girl goes through, into the tree that Melinda is. Whether we’re as strong as an oak or weak as a bush, we have all gone through the disease that strikes Melinda from the inside out. Melinda is like a half-dead tree. Some parts of her strive to blossom and create beauty. Other parts are broken and diseased. Like a dead tree, Melinda needs to save herself and “cut off the damage, [so it] is possible for the tree to grow again” (187). The symbolism of a tree is significant in “Speak.” Trees reflect her growing process. In the beginning, Melinda is a sick and lifeless tree. Her view is negative and dark. She’s so far past repair, bursts of sunlight do her no good. Sunlight would be pe
Read more

How Starr Goes from Acting to Embracing in The Hate U Give

By -
In The Hate U Give, Starr Carter is caught between two worlds. She lives in a predominantly black neighborhood, but her father sends her and her brothers to a private school where she is surrounded by white people. She talks about acting differently depending on what group she is around, which can create some identity problems. She says on page 11, "Funny how it works with white kids though. It's dope to be black until it's hard to be black." When at Williamson, she sees white kids that think it's cool to engage in black culture, but she knows they don't understand what she goes through in her Garden Heights community. She witnessed her friend Natasha's death when she was 10 years old, and she sees gang activity in her community all the time. When she is among her black friends, like at the party, they tease her for hanging out with the white kids. This reminds me of a Drake song where he says, "I used to get teased for being black, and now I'm
Read more

Postmodernism in Curious Incident

By -
Before I start writing, I first want to acknowledge that I just really loved this book! It seemed like a lot of the class had trouble enjoying or appreciating the novel because it's so different stylistically, which is understandable, but all of those unique elements helped make the novel more authentic. The main topic I want to focus on (also what I'm writing my paper on) is how a lot of postmodernist elements were used in the novel to make Christopher come to life. While obviously not every postmodern novel is about an autistic kid, I think Haddon really used a lot of these elements to his advantage and they ended up working out really well to characterize Christopher. One of the major postmodern elements which helps this book really craft an authentic portrayal of autism is the fact that it's metafictive. Basically, this means it's a "story within a story." Readers would be extremely limited just reading the parts of the novel which are meant to be C
Read more