Fighting Dehumanization with Characterization
First and foremost, this is hands down my favorite book of the semester. I have thoroughly enjoyed all of
our texts but I literally could not put La Linea down. I was going to wait to write this post until we’d finished
with Zlata but I’m too amped up. I have been building a thematic unit surrounding illegal immigration and
this piece is exactly what that unit plan is missing.
The reason this text is so perfect for the classroom is that Ann Jaramillo’s characterization turns an
unfathomable circumstance into a relatable situation. By framing Miguel as a lost soul (literally and
figuratively) she creates commonality between her adolescent readership and the protagonist. “If I’d ever
belonged in San Jacinto, I didn’t belong now” helps the audience connect with Miquel (Jaramillo 21). This
connection is crucial for my unit. The entire point of the thematic unit is to get students thinking about the
migrant’s perspective which is all too often lost in moralistic debates and political rhetoric.
I think a large part of our problem and inability to come to a unified cultural consensus on this issue is
that migrants are frequently dehumanized. You can see this reflected in Jamarillo’s characterization of
Moises. In him, she creates a dynamic coyote. He is a man of honor and integrity despite his notoriously
maligned profession. Even though Miguel and co. lack the necessary funds for his services, Moises
agrees to take them across la linea out of loyalty to Don Clemente (Jaramillo 89).
Admittedly, this argument would be more persuasive if Don Clemente was not a mob boss but Moises
further demonstrates his good nature after being shot in the desert. His final act is to help Miguel, Javi,
and Elana in the only way he can. Despite his injuries, Moises pushes his pack out of the jeep in one last
desperate attempt to give his charges a better chance of survival (Jaramillo 103). In what was possibly
his final act on Earth, Moises performed an entirely selfless act for near total strangers. I’ve no doubt that,
had his efforts been discovered, the rangers would have shot him again. Only this time, he would have
suffered an injury more fatal than a shoulder wound.
Moises’s experience serves two major purposes. First, it underscores the underlying message in the
book - migrants are people, not monsters. Second, it illustrates without pretense or judgement that
American bigotry is costing migrants their lives. Jaramillo does not berate the rangers. Nor does she
have Miguel, Javier, or Elana rage against Moises’s (maybe) murderers. She preserves the militia men
as a faceless entity, I believe, to avoid sounding accusatory. A tone which could create a rift between her
American born audience members and her text.
Instead she uses the image of Moises, splayed across the back seat of the jeep like a deer, to do the
talking for her (Jaramillo 103). To the rangers, Moises was nothing more than an animal to be slaughtered
and racked. Jaramillo’s depiction demonstrates how deadly the practice of dehumanizing migrants truly is.
It forces those of us who were born here to face what our intolerance is inflicting on innocent, desperate
people. PEOPLE.
Reading this book made me reflect back on something a Professor told me last semester in reference to
social injustices. Stand up for what’s right, but “don’t ever feel guilty.” But, I think, that may be part of the
problem. Not enough of us feel guilty. Not enough of us feel ashamed that this is happening in the “land of
the free.” It is lack of guilt that allows atrocities like this to continue. But I digress…
I could go on about the ways Jaramillo uses characterization to create a compelling story that builds
empathy. From Javi’s devotion to Miguel and Elana’s survival, to the kindness of the people who fed the
children aboard mata gente, Jaramillo’s text works tirelessly to humanize migrants by telling their story.
That is the inherent value of La Linea, and precisely why it deserves a place in every adolescent classroom.
Maybe if we can raise a generation that is receptive to a multitude of perspectives, one day no one will
have to feel guilty.
Works Cited:
Jaramillo, Ann. La Linea. Macmillian, 2008.
I loved this post, Chelsea. 'La Linea' is tied with 'The Hate U Give' for my favorite book from this class. 'La Linea' does exactly what your title and article talks about. I especially liked how you said "the migrants perspective ... is all too often lost in the moralistic debates and political rhetoric." I think that is an important subject we don't talk about enough. In the past four years, thanks to President Trump, migrants from Mexico have been reduced to 'rapists and criminals' that are 'flooding' across the border. This rhetoric that you mentioned, which has come from the highest echelon of the American government, has made so many Americans judge migrants on only the violent minority among them, when, if you look at what they have provided the United States on a whole, it is clear they are a vital part of our society and economy.
ReplyDelete